Archive

Posts Tagged ‘amateur radio’

Support for the Rafael Micro R820t tuner in Cocoa Radio

October 26th, 2012 2 comments

R820t tuner on a rtl-sdr compatible dongle, from eBay seller CosyCave

Relating to the rtl-sdr work that has been done, the E4000 tuner was the standard barer for a long time.  However, Elonics has discontinued this part, and it’s becoming difficult to find.  The popularity, and scarcity, of this part has encouraged sellers to offer products claiming to be built with the E4000 and are not.  Luckily, someone discovered the code for using the R820t tuner in the Linux V4Lin drivers.  They ported this code into the rtl-sdr source maintained by osmocom.

I just finished porting their code into Cocoa Radio.  Now, it’s possible to use my software with both the E4000 and the R820t.  On startup, Cocoa Radio will automatically detect which tuner you’re using and perform the appropriate actions.

It did take a little while to finish this work, and there are several more tuners out there.  If you are desperate for support of a specific tuner, you can donate a device for the cause and I’ll try to support it.  By the way, Softshell uses the same code for tuning as Cocoa Radio, if you recompile softshell, it should include this new code.

All the relevant code and binaries are, as usual, available at github.  Make absolutely sure that you also update the softshell repository!



New Cocoa Radio release!!

October 11th, 2012 9 comments

Cocoa radio interface explained (click for full size)

Well, I’m back from vacation and I want to tell everyone about a new version of Cocoa Radio (my application for demodulating radio signals using the rtlsdr dongles on mac os x, written in Objective C).  This version seems to be running really well.  I’ve set the sample rate to 1024000 samples per second for the moment (though this value can be changed in the code), and at this rate everything seems really stable.  Please give it a try and create issues at the github issues page if you find any problems.  I should say that I’m a little tired of working on it, so unless there are major issues I’ll be working on other projects for a while.  I encourage others to take a look at the code if they’re interested in SDR.  It’s not as scary as it looks!

Also, the sliders are a little buggy (especially the bandwidth ones).  Move the a little bit once the app starts up and they’ll work correctly.

Finally, I don’t have any support for AM (amplitude modulation) yet.  It’s an easy modulation type, and I may add it soon.



Cocoa Radio Alpha testing

September 15th, 2012 12 comments

I’ve been working on a stand-alone software defined radio (SDR) application for Mac OS on-and-off for a few months, and I think it’s good enough now to encourage people to test it and provide feedback.  Though it’s possible, of course, to do everything my app does in GNU Radio, it’s much more convenient to have a dedicated app.  Especially because this app uses a lot less CPU than GNU Radio.

This video shows the basic operation of the user interface:

And this one shows an ‘inside peek’ at what happens to the signal inside of the application. In normal usage, the waterfall display won’t do this, but it’s an interesting effect:

There are still many, many bugs, but it should be enough to play around with. I’ve been able to listen to broadcast FM radio for some time using the app. There is no squelch control, that’s on the list of things to add. Also, it’s possible to get audio buffer underruns. It’s likely caused by slight differences in the clock rate of the rtl-sdr dongle and the audio device that you’re using.

If you notice any bugs, or have specific issues that you would like addressed, please create an issue on the github page.  Also, if you are able to contribute, please let me know.  I’m obviously in need of some GUI assistance!

One word of advice, don’t try to change the modulation type using the drop-down menu, it doesn’t work! :)

Again, code is available at github, as is an application binary.



Compiling GnuRadio 3.3.0 on Mountain Lion

July 25th, 2012 6 comments

Fixing all the little issues with this process took me days, so I apologize if it’s a complicated and multi-step process.  These steps worked for me, hopefully they work for you too, but YMMV.

First of all, it is vital that you don’t have the macports boost 1.50 installed.  There is a problem with that version where the x86_64 version of the library isn’t compiled.  This is mentioned in an earlier post, and the mac ports trac entry is here.

The easiest way to begin is to install boost 1.49 then run “sudo port install gnuradio-core” and let macports install all of the pre-requisite packages (you may need to perform the fix I mentioned in that earlier post to fix netpbm) .  When it finally gets to gnuradio-core, it will fail.  Now, what you need to do is:

$sudo port edit gnuradio-core

Follow the instructions, again in that earlier post (update 2).

$sudo port clean gnuradio-core
$sudo port -n install gnuradio-core
---> Computing dependencies for gnuradio-core
---> Fetching archive for gnuradio-core
---> Attempting to fetch gnuradio-core-3.3.0_0+python26.darwin_12.x86_64.tbz2 from http://packages.macports.org/gnuradio-core
---> Fetching distfiles for gnuradio-core
---> Verifying checksum(s) for gnuradio-core
---> Extracting gnuradio-core
---> Applying patches to gnuradio-core
---> Configuring gnuradio-core

THIS IS IMPORTANT!: Cancel (control-c) when it says “Configuring gnuradio-core.”  At this point, we need to hand-edit the configure script in the gnuradio source directory.  The reason for this is because some of the assembler code in gnuradio uses 32-bit only opcodes.  When compiling for 64-bit machines they generate errors.  It’s necessary for them to be compiled differently.  Luckily, when Lion was released, a fix was devised and added to macports.  The same exact fix (in principle) should work for Mountain Lion.  But, in the configure script, the change looks for Lion and doesn’t detect Mountain Lion.  We just need to change the test to detect Mountain Lion.  The difference is only the version of darwin used.  This information is in this trac.

$cd /opt/local/var/macports/build/
$ls
<cd to the long directory that ends with science_gnuradio-core>
$cd gnuradio-core/work/gnuradio-3.3.0
$sudo vi configure

Once editing the configure script, search for “darwin*10*” or “darwin*11*”.  This is easy if you hit the forward slash and type “darwin\*1″:

/darwin\*1

The region of interest should look like this (the numbers are the line numbers):

20154     *darwin*11*) 
20155 # The cast to long int works around a bug in the HP C Compiler 
20156 # version HP92453-01 B.11.11.23709.GP, which incorrectly rejects 
20157 # declarations like `int a3[[(sizeof (unsigned char)) >= 0]];'. 
20158 # This bug is HP SR number 8606223364.

Change the *darwin*11* (or *darwin*10*) to: *darwin*12*

Close the vi session by hitting <esc> then : then type wq and enter.

Now, run “sudo port -n install gnuradio-core”.  Make sure that you DO NOT clean the package.  This will destroy our edited configure script.

When that finishes (hopefully it does!) you should be all set!  You’ll probably want to install gnuradio-companion as well as gnuradio-audio-osx.

If you have any problems or questions, let me know in the comments.



Using softshell with GNURadio

July 24th, 2012 2 comments

It has been a little while since I released the very early code for softshell (not that the code has advanced much), and I’ve received a few requests for a bit more information about how it’s intended to be used.

I admit that I hacked it together very quickly so that I could make some basic use of the rtlsdr dongles on my mac.  To be very clear, Softshell does no actual SDR itself.  You can really look at it more like a driver for the rtlsdr.  Softshell opens a connection to the rtl device, allows you to tune its internal oscillator, and puts the data on the network.

To start, install the rtl device in your USB port, then open Softshell.

Freshly opened

If you see a similar window, it means that Softshell has found your device (the ezcap in this case).  It is, perhaps, a good time to mention that I’ve only ported the tuner code for the Elonics E4000 tuner.  Click the “Open” button to have the program open the connection to the device.  If it detects that you have the E4000 the “Tuner type” field will be filled in with “Elonics E4000.”

Once this is done, changes to the sample rate and center frequency will take effect with the “Update” button is clicked.  The Center frequency is provided in Hz.

Now, that’s all fine and good, but you’re just tuning the device.  To actually get the data out of it, you need to setup the network settings.  Choose a port number for Softshell to listen to, I use “12345,” and click the “Running” checkbox.

Finally, in GnuRadio, you need to use a “TCP Source” block setup as a client with the same port number you used before.

Setting up GnuRadio to work with Softshell (click for full size)

Once that’s done you should be up & running.  Note that, natively, the rtl device actually outputs unsigned bytes and that Softshell converts these to floats centered around zero.  Some GnuRadio examples include the blocks that perform this conversion.  If you come across this, just remove those blocks.

Good luck!  Please feel free to comment with any questions or issues!



Softrock application available

May 11th, 2012 2 comments

Here’s a compiled executable, including the rtl-sdr library, for those that don’t want to get the source on github and compile it.

Also, if anyone wants to design a logo, it would be much appreciated!

Softshell-alpha



Softshell pre-alpha

May 10th, 2012 20 comments

Softshell works!

Basic functionality of Softshell works!  In the image above, you can see the app (Cocoa-rtl-sdr is the old name) on the right.  I didn’t even have the text boxes wired in yet for the sample rate and center frequency, because I was so excited that it was working.  The samples from the receiver are transported into GNU radio over TCP where a simple FFT is being performed.  Notice that all the extra blocks needed for the original rtl-sdr aren’t needed, because I’m doing all of the uchar  to float conversion inside of Softshell.

The code that’s available on GitHub was hacked together with some network code that I can’t release right now, but I’m going to move it over to code that I can use soon.

Update:

Here’s a pre-compiled application for those that don’t feel like compiling it:

Softshell-alpha



Weird return value discrepancies between Softshell and RTL-SDR

May 6th, 2012 2 comments

I’ve made significant progress porting over the rtl-sdr code.  I added printfs to every function that interfaces with the USB port so that I can compare what happens.  Everything seems normal, up until the gainControl function.  Once there, the returns from my application are usually about one digit off of the rtl-sdr code.  If anyone has any ideas, I’d love to hear them!

Link to the comparison spreadsheet.



Softshell, the MacOS RTL-SDR driver

May 5th, 2012 17 comments

For the uninitiated, a few months ago one of the developers in the V4L (video for linux)/DVB (digital video broadcasting) team,  Antti Palosaari, discovered that this cheap video tuner dongle could be used as a software defined radio.  Since then, it has developed a HUGE following!  The team over at osmocom helped to package the driver into a separate executable.  The application seems to work well, and even compiles on the mac.  The problem is, though, that you have to install the libusb library for it to work.  It’s not hard to do, but you have to install mac ports, then install libusb.  What a pain.

Most of the active discussion about rtlsdr appears to be happening at the RTLSDR subreddit.

RTL SDR compatible dongle

The idea behind Softshell is to port the osmocom rtl-sdr code into a native Cocoa application that doesn’t need libusb.  I’ve published the code to github, but it’s still very early in the development process.

This post is just meant as a heads-up for anyone with Objective-C experience and an interest.



The enemy of any analyzer: Phase Noise.

April 12th, 2012 No comments

That looks neat, but it's very, very bad...

If there’s one thing that I was blissfully ignorant of before trying to build a spectrum analyzer, that is now an annoyance and borderline obsession, it’s phase noise.  Phase noise is exactly the same as any other kind of noise, but unlike noise on a DC signal, phase noise is mode like tiny variations in the frequency of the signal.

To get a little more specific, think about phase as a quantity that describes how far along the sine wave we are at any given instant.  It can be described in degrees, radians, or even if you’re a little radical, tau radians.  The idea is the same.  Phase increases until it “rolls over” at the end of the cycle.  It looks a bit like a sawtooth wave, assuming that we’re discussing a constant frequency, unmodulated wave.  Hopefully you believe me that phase noise looks just like noise superimposed on the sawtooth-shaped phase ramp.

Phase related to sine

I think the graphs above helps to illustrates the relationship between phase (above) and a sine wave (below).  I’ve re-scaled the phase so that it goes from zero to one over the range of one whole number.

In the frequency domain, phase noise is a little easier to understand, and see.  The graph at the head of this article is an extreme example of phase noise.  Really, there are two kinds of phase noise here, and one of them we can do something about.

PLL example (From a Linear Technology data sheet)

I tried really hard to find some nice graphics to use to describe, simply, the basic operation of a PLL-based oscillator.  The best I could come up with is the above diagram.  This was lifted from the Linear Technology LMX2326 PLL IC.  This is the same (or damn near) as the PLL chip that’s used in the analyzer.  The bottom left corner is the oscillator.  All it does it generate a single frequency set by the voltage coming into pin 6.  On the PLL chip, pin 2 is the output from the “charge pump,” which is how the PLL sets the tuning voltage.

PLO1 Schematic (by Scotty)

Unfortunately, the PLL in the spectrum analyzer isn’t this simple (if you can call an normal PLL simple!).  In the center, near the top, notice the Op-Amp.  The high-side supply to this amplifier is +20 volts (at least).  The reason for this is as simple as that’s what the VCO (voltage controlled oscillator) needs.  It isn’t possible for the PLL to produce voltages like this, so we need this extra supply.

VCO power supply noise

Now, the question is: “What happens when there’s noise on the +20 voltage supply?”  The waveform on the oscilloscope above shows about 20mV of noise on the 20 volt supply.  The frequency of this noise is about 20kHz. It’s no coincidence that the spacing between the peaks in the comb-like plot is about 20kHz.  What’s happening is that the noise on the 20 volt supply is literally modulating the output.  Incidentally, that’s exactly what you do if you want to frequency modulate something.

Now that we know what the cause is, what can we do about it?  If we eliminate that noise, we can fix the problem.  I had made a second 20 volt supply, and used cheap capacitors.  Apparently, when using high voltages (relatively speaking) the amount of capacitance decreases in cheap, small, ceramic capacitors.  I went back to the first supply I made, and added even more capacitance.

Better +20 volt supply

The lower trace is the new +20 volt supply, and it’s peak-to-peak noise voltage is about 3mV.  But the proof of the pudding is in the eating, so how does it affect the phase noise?

Much improved phase noise

It squashes it like a bug!  The above plot is almost textbook for phase noise.  The large peak in the center is representing the width of the final filter (I’ll get to that in a later post) and the skirt is caused by traditional phase noise.  If I zoom in to the center of that plot it’s easier to see:

close in phase noise

Here, I’ve highlighted another common cause of phase noise: PLL loop bandwidth.  This is the bandwidth of the filter that smooths out the pulses that come out of the PLL chip.

That’s all I have for now…  I’ve tried to make this topic, which is very technical and dry, interesting and accessible to those that haven’t spent the last 5 years trying to build a spectrum analyzer.  I hope you’ve enjoyed it.

If you want a much more in-depth and technical analysis, see Scotty’s website.



 

57 visitors online now
46 guests, 11 bots, 0 members
Max visitors today: 69 at 04:53 am UTC
This month: 100 at 05-08-2013 07:53 pm UTC
This year: 199 at 01-04-2013 06:37 pm UTC
All time: 1081 at 06-12-2011 07:36 pm UTC