Home > Electronics Projects, HAM Radio, Projects > RF Transceiver using the MRF49XA

RF Transceiver using the MRF49XA

December 8th, 2010 Leave a comment Go to comments

Transceiver breakout boards

I’m just finishing up my last class ever!!!  (for credit, anyway.)  It was a really fun, mostly because I decided to have fun with my last class, and make it a 4/5 (undergrad/graduate).  This meant that it was much easier and less theory-heavy than those that I’m used to.  Anyway, as a grad student, I was expected to do something extra, and I decided to make a RF transceiver module.  I looked around for a little while, and I settled on the Microchip MRF49XA.  In general, it’s a nice chip.  It has about the same capability as the Micrel MICRF6xx modules that I’ve used in the past.  The Micrel modules cost $20/ea. and the Microchip IC is around $3.  I was able to make the whole breakout board for the MRF49XA for less than the Micrel module alone.  One of these days, I should dig out my notes from the Micrel project and post them, but I digress.  I noticed a distinct lack of programming information using the MRF49XA, so I’m posting not only my schematic and PCB, but the software library I wrote for the Atmel AVRmega.

Breakout board schematic

The schematic I created for the breakout board is, in large part, copied from the reference schematic from the datasheet.  There are a few parts that make up the complete schematic, including power regulation, microcontroller interface, RF balun, and the IC.  Everything but the balun is really easy to understand, the power input can be +5 volts or more (probably up to about 14 volts) while using the LM317, or if the LM317 is omitted, +3.3 volts.  The MRF49XA is really a 3.3 volt part, and expects 3.3 volt I/0.  Originally, and on the PCB I had made, I had 2 ground pins.  Since then I realized it would be useful to output regulated 3.3 volt output, so I changed one of the grounds for that.  The only other major portion of the circuit is the balun.  This is used to transform the balanced RF input/output from the IC to the unbalanced antenna connector.  This circuit also provides power to the RF power amplifier inside the IC.

Breakout board top

Breakout board top

The PCB designed from the schematic is also fairly straight-forward.  A few things are worth noting, however.  I’ve added some silkscreen between 2 of the pins on the LM317.  These are to indicate where you could jumper if the breakout board is supplied with regulated power.  I used a 0805 0-ohm resistor (see the image below).  The voltage output of the LM317 is selected with R1 and R2.  I decided not to include the “stop” layer on this image so as to not clutter it, but near the word “Fence” there is a strip without solder mask over the vias.  If you wanted to isolate the RF from the outside, you could build a fence out of copper foil (or something).  The Antenna connector is a end-launch SMA, though it could also be raw coax if you want to save some money.

Close up

The only pins necessary for complete functioning of the device are the standard SPI set (MOSI, MISO, SCK, !CS), and IRO (interrupt request out).  The IRO pin is not strictly necessary, but HIGHLY recommended.  The MRF module uses the IRO pin to notify the microcontroller of a few time-sensitive events, such as FIFO full/empty conditions.

MCU interface while transmitting (click to enlarge)

The diagram included above (from the MRF49XA datasheet) provides a useful overview for the transmitting process.  The take-away message is that you first send the “Transmit data enable” (TXDEN) command, which loads 0xAAAA into the transmit FIFO.  You can either leave this in there, as a preamble, or replace it with data of your choice.  Then, you send the “Transmit carrier enable” (TXCEN) command.  At this point, the PLL starts, and the PA turns on, then transmission starts.  When the first full byte leaves the FIFO the IRO asserts.  Hopefully this forces the MCU to jump to your interrupt service routine.  Once there, if the CS pin is held low, the MRF will bring SDO (MISO) high.  This is a clear signal that the FIFO needs attention.  You can continue this process for as long as you have data.  Once you’re done, you need to load a “dummy byte” into the FIFO so your last data byte makes it out.  Finally, on the next interrupt, shut down the transmitter by sending TXCEN and TXDEN = 0.

Receiving FIFO usage (click to enlarge)

This diagram illustrates another detail of the interface to the MRF.  Also borrowed from the datasheet, it describes the way to access the receive FIFO using SPI.  Typically, SPI interfaces don’t have a notion of registers quite like I2C does, but the MRF does.  To get access to the receive FIFO you initiate an SPI transfer to the MRF module with the contents equal to the address of the receive FIFO.  In this case it’s 0xA000.  Once the first byte of the transfer is complete, the MRF begins outputting the FIFO value on the SDO pin.  It is also possible to gain access to the receive FIFO using FSEL (FIFO Select, called “Data” on the schematic) pin.

Baseband Bandwidth calculation (click for full size)

Before going into some details on the implementation of the library, I’d like to talk briefly about the RF frequency, deviation, and bit rate determination.  I’ve attached another snippet from the datasheet (hopefully the last one), and I’m going to go through the math quickly with numbers for my application.  I’m using 434 Mhz band, with 9600 baud, using a 10ppm crystal.  This means that fxerror = 10 * (434000/1000000) = 4.34 Khz.  Then, our deviation must be 9.6 + 2*fxerror + 10 = 28.28; the closest modulation is 30 Khz.  Therefore, BBBW = 30*2 – 10 = 50 Khz.  The closest BBBW is 67 Khz.

Spectrum plot from alternating 1s and 0s

I recently gained access to a spectrum analyzer courtesy of the OSU Robotics Club.  This is a spectrum plot of 0xAA, or alternating 1′s and 0′s.  It’s a little strange that the distance between peaks is about 90 Khz, as it should be more like 60 Khz.  The comb-like appearance on the flanks is probably from the transceiver switching from 1 to 0 across the scan.

Transmitting '1'

This plot is while transmitting all 1′s.  It’s obvious this is much cleaner, but very little information is actually being transmitted here.

With respect to the Atmel AVR library that I wrote, it includes a header file devoted entirely to defining the registers and bits as defined in the datasheet.  Each section includes a comment block description, and in the cases where some bit values need to be calculated, the equations used.  On the occasions where a bitfield is used for some integer value, I include a mask to ensure that if the derived values overrun the width of the bitfield they don’t pollute unrelated settings.  Below, I’ve included an example.

/*******************************************************************************
 * Convenience definitions for band setting
 *
 * These defines are provided for use configuring the MRF49XA module.
 * Select the frequency band for the given hardware by uncommenting the
 * appropriate line.  Set the crystal load capacitance using the MRF_XTAL_LD_CAP
 * value.
 *
 * The load capacitance is given by the following equation:
 *
 * Cap pF = 8.5 + (LCS / 2)
 * LCS = (10 - 8.5) * 2
 *
 * For 10pF: LCS = (10 - 8.5) * 2 = 1.5 * 2 = 3
 *
 ******************************************************************************/
#pragma mark General Configuration Register
#define MRF_GENCREG		0x8000		// General config. register
#define MRF_TXDEN		0x0080		// TX Data Register enable bit
#define MRF_FIFOEN		0x0040		// FIFO enable bit
#define MRF_FBS_MASK		0x0030		// Mask for the band selection
#define MRF_LCS_MASK		0x000F		// Load capacitance mask
// 10pF Crystal load capacitance
#define MRF_LCS			3		// Crystal Load capacitance
// Frequency band settings
#define MRF_FBS_434		0x0010		// 434 mHz band
#define MRF_FBS_868		0x0020		// 868 mHz band
#define MRF_FBS_915		0x0030		// 915 mHz band

All of the files in the library depend on a “hardware.h” file that defines the qualities of the hardware.  The hope is that this file is the only place that implementation-specific code lives.  There are some holes still, however.  Finally, the mrf49xa.c and mrf49xa.h files behave the way you would expect.  The module requires a total of 5 pins and one interrupt.  Some of those pins may be shared with other SPI devices.

void MRF_init(void);

uint8_t MRF_is_idle();
uint16_t MRF_statusRead(void);

// Packet structures
// the maximum payload size
#define MRF_PAYLOAD_LEN 40
// Space for preamble, sync, length and dummy
#define MRF_TX_PACKET_LEN	MRF_PAYLOAD_LEN + 5

typedef struct {
	uint8_t	length;
	char		payload[MRF_PAYLOAD_LEN];
} MRF_packet_t;

// Packet based functions
void MRF_transmit_packet(MRF_packet_t *packet);
MRF_packet_t* MRF_receive_packet();

I’ve included a snippet of the header file above so I could mention the basic process for using the MRF module.  The MRF_init function expects the SPI bus to be configured, and it performs the basic initialization of the device.  Once it’s started, the interrupts on the AVR must be enabled.  In the main loop (or at least as often as a packet can be transmitted) you should call MRF_receive_packet.  This function will return NULL if no packet was received, and a pointer to a packet structure if it was.  MRF_transmit_packet takes a packet structure and transmits it.  This is an asynchronous operation, and you may use the packet structure (or it’s memory) once it returns.  This is useful if you want to use a packet structure created on the stack.  It is possible to get yourself into trouble with MRF_packet_transmit, as it spin-loops on a lock set in the ISR.  If for whatever reason that lock isn’t unlocked at some point you can hardlock.  I’ve done my best to ensure that it doesn’t happen, but beware.

And, finally, links to the files.  If there seems to be sufficient interest, I’ll open up a SVN (maybe Google Code, who knows) with these files and a main program useful for telemetry and the like.  Post in the comments if you’re interested, or send me a line.

hardware.h

MRF49XA_definitions.h

MRF49XA.c

MRF49XA.h

spi.h

spi.c

Also, the PCB is available as a public design from BatchPCB.  I’ll include a bill of materials if necessary, though the components are clearly printed on the silkscreen.

Oh!  before you ask: No, I don’t know what the range is.  The longest I’ve tried is about 20 feet, and there weren’t any errors, but it was only about 100 bytes.  The chip is rated to 7dBm, I think, so go from there. :)

Update:

Here is a simple bill of materials, I used the Eagle export feature, and attempted to place digikey part numbers for each part.  I’m not saying they’re all right, you may want to make sure you’re getting what you think is correct.

partlist.txt

Also, here are the eagle files.  They aren’t necessarily finalized

eagle_files.zip



  1. aiqon
    October 14th, 2011 at 03:09 | #1

    Im very interested. can we stay in touch by mail? stas.stelle ( at ) gmail ( dot ) com

  2. October 14th, 2011 at 06:06 | #2

    Sure, a wire antenna is just like any other antenna. Do your best to match it to 50 ohms at 434 Mhz, and you should be all set.

  3. aiqon
    October 16th, 2011 at 01:43 | #3

    what are the values for R1 and R2? and do u by chance have a supplier that can send all parts? digikey kinda lacks the LM317 in SOT223 :/

  4. October 16th, 2011 at 07:00 | #4

    I bought everything from DigiKey. This is the exact part I used: 296-12602-1-ND. As far as R1 and R2, I usually don’t specify it because I make it up with the actual resistors I have on hand. Using the LM317 calculator it looks like you want 240 for R1 and about 400 for R2.

  5. Pankil
    September 13th, 2012 at 22:15 | #5

    I want to design pcb with on board antenna using mrf49xa. For designing of antenna i can not understand which type of antenna i can use for 915MHz. If yuu have guideline then help me..

  6. September 14th, 2012 at 06:11 | #6

    You have quite a few options. The datasheet discusses these in more detail, but you can use a monopole, dipole, or loop antenna. The caveat is that you’ll need to calculate new values for the matching components, and this isn’t a trivial exercise.

  7. Tyger
    October 5th, 2012 at 06:37 | #7

    The MRF49XA Breakout board has other values on it. so what should we use? the once on the board or the schematic?

  8. October 6th, 2012 at 06:38 | #8

    Sorry it took so long to reply, I’ve been out of the country.

    Anyway, I don’t remember 100%. The values are exactly the same as the datasheet for the MRF49XA in the 400 Mhz example schematic. Make sure you don’t use the 900 MHz values.

  9. Nayab
    December 5th, 2012 at 12:35 | #9

    hi hpux735 ..
    am also making RFID boar using MRF49xa and i need your help imidiatly..can you contact me by mail?
    nayab.khan@gmail.com

  10. December 6th, 2012 at 08:14 | #10

    Sorry, I don’t address questions ‘off line’. If you have a specific question, feel free to ask here. I’ll answer it if I can. Thanks.

  11. Nayab
    December 8th, 2012 at 06:06 | #11

    @hpux735
    OK thats fine..i am using PIC18F452 as host UC and i wrote my code in Mikro c pro..but try hard i am unable to transmit the RF signal correctly. i dnt know why?
    i have already read your whole post and all comments as well.you have done good work an i think you can help me..

    am using external crystal for host UC of 24MHZ and SCK of 1.5MHZ i.e FOS/16
    -> i have also rad AN1552.
    can you figur out problem areas?

  12. December 8th, 2012 at 23:43 | #12

    If you’re using a PIC it may be easier to use the microchip provided sample code. That’s what I based mine off of. I ported it to atmel. No sense in you porting it back to microchip. I don’t remember where to find it, but the microchip code is publicly available.

  13. Nayab
    December 9th, 2012 at 03:10 | #13

    @hpux735
    yes am using that code but i think i have some hardware problem.but i am unable to sort it out.
    mrf is giving all other responses as expected but not transmitting Rf signal…?

  14. December 9th, 2012 at 13:33 | #14

    @Nayab

    Check the interrupt line with a logic analyzer or something. If you don’t service the MRF49XA appropriately then it won’t work.

  15. Nayab
    December 14th, 2012 at 09:41 | #15

    @hpux735
    what do you mean by service?

  16. December 14th, 2012 at 09:52 | #16

    I mean that when the MRF49XA requests an interrupt of the microcontroller, it actually requires that the microcontroller do something about it. For example, if you don’t respond when trying to start transmitting it won’t do it. (If I remember correctly).

    RegisterSet(MRF_PMCREG); // Turn everything off
    RegisterSet(MRF_GENCREG_SET | MRF_TXDEN); // Enable TX FIFO
    // Reset value of TX FIFO is 0xAAAA

    RegisterSet(MRF_PMCREG | MRF_TXCEN); // Begin transmitting
    // Everything else is handled in the ISR

    Then, in the ISR:

    RegisterSet(MRF_TXBREG | transmit_buffer[counter++]);

    If you don’t respond by providing additional data (TXBREG is the transmit byte register) it won’t transmit.

  17. Nayab
    December 14th, 2012 at 10:25 | #17

    am axactly doing the same..
    here is my code
    plz have a look
    SPI_Command(PMCREG); // turn off the transmitter and receiver
    SPI_Command(GENCREG | 0×0080); // Enable the Tx register
    //—- Packet transmission
    // Reset value of the Tx regs are [AA AA], we can start transmission
    //—- Enable Tx
    SPI_Command(PMCREG |0×0020); // turn on tx

    Slave_Select=0;
    Chip_Select=0;
    //Delay_Ms(200); // chip select low
    while(!RF_SDO);//{led2=~led2;Delay_Ms(100);};

    SPI_Write16(TXBREG | 0xAA); // preamble
    while(!RF_SDO);

    SPI_Write16(TXBREG | 0x2D); // sync pattern 1st byte
    while(!RF_SDO);

    SPI_Write16(TXBREG | 0xD4); // sync pattern 2nd byte
    while(!RF_SDO);

    SPI_Write16(TXBREG | length);

    for (a=0;a<length;a++){

    SPI_Write16(TXBREG | data1[a]); // write a byte to tx register

    }

    while(!RF_SDO){}

    SPI_Write16(TXBREG |0×00); // write a dummy byte since the previous byte is still in buffer
    while (!RF_SDO){}
    // wait for the last byte transmission end
    Slave_Select=1;
    Chip_Select=1;
    Delay_Ms(200);

  18. December 14th, 2012 at 10:35 | #18

    @Nayab

    In that case, it’s possible that you’re doing something wrong in your configuration. I would still analyze the state of the interrupt out pin while doing this routing to see if the MRF is requesting interrupts. That’s a good indication that it’s working and is actively requesting data.

  19. Nayab
    December 14th, 2012 at 11:08 | #19

    yes..fine..
    am gona read stsreg..
    but it also sends RF_SDO down when a byte is transmitted sucseesfully..isnt it?

  20. December 14th, 2012 at 11:18 | #20

    @Nayab

    Yes, but I don’t know what’s happening in your application. You simply say that you’re “unable to transmit” I don’t know where your results deviate from what is expected. I recommend buying a MRF49XA device (either mine of microchips) that has known-working behavior. Then use a logic analyzer to capture all the communication between the MRF and the uC. Do the same with yours and try to see where things start changing.

  21. Nayab
    December 14th, 2012 at 11:45 | #21

    hmm

    am using spi or seril clock of 1.5mhz is it fine?

  22. Nayab
    December 14th, 2012 at 11:46 | #22

    dear i dnt have access to spectrum analyzer and logic analyzer am using an oscilloscope to troble shoot all of these..

  23. December 14th, 2012 at 11:50 | #23

    @Nayab

    I’ve been using the saleae logic analyzer. It’s relatively inexpensive. It’s almost a must-have instrument. Without knowing what’s going on between the devices it’s very difficult to debug.

    http://www.saleae.com

  24. Nayab
    December 14th, 2012 at 11:50 | #24

    @hpux735

    what should be its out put power at RFP and RFN while transmitting corecltly?

  25. December 14th, 2012 at 11:54 | #25

    @Nayab

    I actually don’t really know. I’ve always tested it with the balun. The output power with the balun and matching circuitry was very near what was published in the datasheet.

  26. Nayab
    December 14th, 2012 at 12:22 | #26

    @hpux735

    i wana send you a view of my schematic.Can i?
    for point out any thing missed

  27. December 15th, 2012 at 13:44 | #27

    @Nayab

    I received it. It looks normal. I don’t really have time to provide support at this level. There is a forum on the microchip website that may be able to provide more help.

  28. Tyger
    April 26th, 2013 at 14:36 | #28

    Can you please add what your code does? it does not say that on the page.

  29. April 29th, 2013 at 16:20 | #29

    This code is basically only a library intended to be used with this module. What it does is up to you.

Comment pages
1 2 1036
  1. December 9th, 2010 at 10:18 | #1
  2. December 9th, 2010 at 11:31 | #2
  3. November 19th, 2011 at 15:45 | #3


nine − = 6

46 visitors online now
39 guests, 7 bots, 0 members
Max visitors today: 58 at 06:02 am UTC
This month: 109 at 06-04-2013 05:16 am UTC
This year: 199 at 01-04-2013 06:37 pm UTC
All time: 1081 at 06-12-2011 07:36 pm UTC